Introducing, my subject matter in the form of a photograph, with a snappy caption.
From a personal perspective, based on experiences a, b and c of x, y and z, my subject matter makes me feel p, q and r, and so should you. You should feel p, q and r for reasons related to the logical conclusions I have drawn from experiences a, b and c and represent as points l, m and n.
Should you choose to ignore the lines joining points l, m and n, which represent a, b and c, then the consequences for you will be that you might miss a point. If you were to miss a point, let’s say point l, then you would have nothing to draw you to your own experiences - represented by l, m and n, i.e. experiences a, b and c.
To draw you to experience a, represented by point l, in any other way would be virtually impossible; rendering emotion p, for which experience a (represented by point l) invariably produces, non-existent; meaning in my life would cease to exist. The loss of meaning in my life, represented by the meaning escaping you, would render point a, or any other aspect of the equation, equal to nothing.
If you choose to enter into the equation, by adding your interest to the equation, the product of our mutual understanding in this matter would equal meaning in my life and, your life. For the sake of meaning, add something of your own to the equation in the form of comment n. (Where n exists, the addition of my comment in the form of k equals the addition of more comments and is represented by the equation n plus k = n and k)
You, for whose benefit I reconstructed my experiences of x, y and z in the form of l, m and n, which are greater than but not equal to yours, understand what I’m saying here. My point of view (divided by points l, m and n) on x, y and z is greater than, but not including, yours. Hell, I might even add a bad word to add weight to my points.
In conclusion, just joking with a snappy little line about so long.