The formula for psychologist Dr Phil accused of brainwashing women, forcing them to watch naked man
October 14th 2009 23:41
For the sake of argument, let's say that x about subject y equals z. Or in plain English, xy = z. Now let's say that where x exists y follows and is z. Now let us make y equal Dr. Phil and make x equal he brainwashed two women and forced them to share a room with a naked man and make z equal true. Or, Dr Phil brainwashed two women and forced them to share a room with a naked man is true.
Now let us assume that x is a function of a and y is a function of b and z is a function of c. And let's make a equal Dr Phil's psychosis and b equal a travelling trouser salesman and i equal whatever I say. It then follows that Dr Phil, having an episode, brainwashed two women and forced them to share a room with a naked man, who was selling them his trousers, because I said so. Which we shall call n.
Therefore, n is a product of i which is part of the subset of n, which makes it a product of itself. In plain English, Dr Phil made a man expose his entire body, genitals and all to this women. Now, let's call her. You first. Go on. Now, if we call her claims a product of her own psychosis, or naked greed, then we shall call her a lying slutfaced bitchmolewhore. If, on the other hand, the product of her claims, let's call them xyz, are found to equal a monetary sum, let's call her and ask her for money. Let's. I have no cash on me. I left my wallet in the carpark.
Rounding it out, Dr Phil, let's call him a fat American prickly-faced bald-arsed lying scam-bucket, has it, let's call that the power to hypnotise, on the lowest common denominator, let's call that the seething product-buying brain-dead burnt-shit eating nose-pickers, or u. So that Dr Phil has hypnotised the lowest common denominator. Or, a fat American prickly-faced bald-arsed lying scam-bucket has it over u. Now, where my trousers are nobody knows. Let's call that unfortunate.
Now let us assume that x is a function of a and y is a function of b and z is a function of c. And let's make a equal Dr Phil's psychosis and b equal a travelling trouser salesman and i equal whatever I say. It then follows that Dr Phil, having an episode, brainwashed two women and forced them to share a room with a naked man, who was selling them his trousers, because I said so. Which we shall call n.
Therefore, n is a product of i which is part of the subset of n, which makes it a product of itself. In plain English, Dr Phil made a man expose his entire body, genitals and all to this women. Now, let's call her. You first. Go on. Now, if we call her claims a product of her own psychosis, or naked greed, then we shall call her a lying slutfaced bitchmolewhore. If, on the other hand, the product of her claims, let's call them xyz, are found to equal a monetary sum, let's call her and ask her for money. Let's. I have no cash on me. I left my wallet in the carpark.
Rounding it out, Dr Phil, let's call him a fat American prickly-faced bald-arsed lying scam-bucket, has it, let's call that the power to hypnotise, on the lowest common denominator, let's call that the seething product-buying brain-dead burnt-shit eating nose-pickers, or u. So that Dr Phil has hypnotised the lowest common denominator. Or, a fat American prickly-faced bald-arsed lying scam-bucket has it over u. Now, where my trousers are nobody knows. Let's call that unfortunate.
| 52 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
Comment by Morgan Bell
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
that was a kind description
Comment by Norm
Consumption Malfunction
Equal and Opposite
Arses and Elbows
Footy Power
I am, after all, the man with no trousers.
Comment by Norm
Consumption Malfunction
Equal and Opposite
Arses and Elbows
Footy Power
I love the Phleghmish masters.
To Rembrandt.
Wucccccchttttttttppp!
Comment by The wonderful Peter Yang
The First Wonderful Peter Yang's Variety Blog
The New Wonderful Peter Yang's variety blog
Power Ranger Online
TV Online
Solar Energy Pannel
Stay healthy and loose weight
Comment by Janet Collins
Acceptable Etiquette
The Social Critic
Janet Collins Blog
Comment by Norm
Consumption Malfunction
Equal and Opposite
Arses and Elbows
Footy Power